VIEW HOME PAGE
2020 AVERAGES: NATIONAL VOTE | ELECTORAL COL. | HOUSE | SENATE | Battlegrounds: FL - OH - AZ - GA - IA - NC - MI - PA - WI - NH - NV - TX - MN

Why early voting gives Democrats an artificial late bump in pre-election polling

Political Ref | October 13, 2020 (Republished from 11/5/16)
 
Because Democrats stress early voting so heavily, they get a bump in the polls as some unlikely voters become certain voters in polling
 
Late polling misses some Trump support because more of it manifests on election day
 
Every poll represents a best estimate based on limited information
 
The bump is illusory, just a function of which side voted first
Image Source, no modifications were made
 

Late polling misses some Trump support

Because of the problem that early voting presents for pollsters, Republicans are probably closer than polls reflect in late polling once early voting has begun. This problem stems from the problem of identifying who is likely to vote.

Every poll represents a best estimate based on limited information

Because voters will label themselves likely to vote most of the time, pollsters use a variety of methods to ferret out who will actually vote. Examples of methods used to find likely voters include assessing the voting history of a poll respondent by determining his or her ability to answer basic questions about the past election or merely asking if he or she voted. Other methods exist, but for the most part it's a straightforward assessment.

Inevitably some respondents who receive the designation as a likely voter will not actually turn out and vote. Unforeseen events intervene or perhaps the person simply forgets to vote. Statistically such events are inevitable. This sort of thing represents one reason why pollsters employ margins of error. Of the flip side, some voters who fail the likely voter screen will actually vote. This is the source of the bump Democrats receive.

The bump is illusory, just a function of which side voted first

Our election cycle lasts for about two months now. First, because this is true, you have a wide range of time within which people vote. Second, because in every poll some people who are deemed unlikely to vote actually end up voting, you will have people included in late polling that were not included before.

In other words, a person who pollsters deemed unlikely to vote one month before the election because he or she failed a likely voter screen will be deemed a likely voter after they have voted. They no longer fail the likely voter screen because now, unlike before, they have recently voted. This particular problem in polling advantages Democrats because they tend to vote early.

Democrats always do everything they can to get their voters out to vote before election day. Republicans always win on the actual election day itself. The question becomes whether Republicans will vote in enough numbers to offset the early Democratic vote.

This problem will produce a late surge for Democrats in polling because they are banking more of their unlikely vote than Republicans. Because Republicans deemed unlikely to vote, but who will actually vote, do not do so until election day, that vote goes uncounted in polling when the Democratic unlikely voter who actually votes will get counted.

So the long election period that we now see in most states makes polling vulnerable to potentially fatal errors with respect to accuracy. Readers should consider the possibility that Democrats may have a phantom bounce that may vaporize on election day, especially where the early vote is particularly large or the election is very close.

 
 
         
  Follow Me on Parler   Follow Me on Facebook   Follow Me on Twitter   Follow Me on YouTube   Follow Me on Minds